# How teams form & perform - Tuckman's team development model

## Basic idea

Tuckman (1965) proposed that teams pass through 4 (later 5) stages on their way to effectiveness. The point is that "storming" is *normal*, not a sign of failure — and "adjourning" deserves attention too.

## Key facts

* Stages: **Forming** → **Storming** → **Norming** → **Performing** → **Adjourning** (added later).
* Positive signs: clear comms, brainstorming, consensus, shared problem-solving, timely hand-offs.
* Negative signs: silos, "thrown over the wall" work, blame culture, frequent absence.
* First proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965
* 4 stages - Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing --> Adjourning (added later)

## Is the team effective or not

### Positive signs

* Clear comms
* Regular brainstorming
* Concensus among team members
* Problem solving done by the group
* Commitment to the project outcomes and the other team members
* Regular team meatings are effective and inclusive
* Timely hand off from team members to others or early advise if this wont happen
* Positive supporting relationships

### Negative signs

* Lack of comms
* No clear roles or responsibilities
* Work is thrown over a wall
* Team members work alone
* Blame others when things go wrong, no one accepts responsibility
* Lack of support for others
* Frequently absent impacting time and creating additional work for others


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://isubasinghe.gitbook.io/isithas-wiki/software_engineering/management/individuals_and_motivation/teams_forming_and_performing.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
